It is argued that full social accessibility has become too complicated. We don't really need to apply lifelong literacy to low-literate people. Instead, we must curb the proliferation of increasingly complex systems with double (or even triple) authorization and lots of jargon. I therefore think that 18% low literacy is simply too little, only when 50% of the people belong to the low-literate group we may finally throw these systems aside. Where is sustainable living in human connection? If this is supposedly illiteracy, and our systems are so complex, it seems rather to indicate that we have drastically misplaced our priorities for people and their usefulness.